Compare mutual funds | Krystal Capitals

How much it grew
	A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund	B: ITI Mid Cap Fund
3-year returnA year, on average	+18.1%Higher	+15.7%
1-year returnTotal over the last year	+5.8%Higher	+1.4%
5-year returnA year, on average	Not enough history	+11.9%
Since launchA year, on average, with at least a year of history	+19.7%Higherfrom Sept 2022	+15.0%from Mar 2021

How it held up in falls

Worst fall

Biggest drop from a high, and when

How it held up in falls
	A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund	B: ITI Mid Cap Fund
Worst fallBiggest drop from a high, and when	−19.7%Smaller fallDec 2024 – Apr 2025	−23.8%Nov 2021 – Jun 2022
Worst 3-year stretchA year, from the unluckiest start date	+18.1%Smaller fall

3-year stretches that made money

Out of every 3-year stretch on record

How steady it was
	A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund	B: ITI Mid Cap Fund
3-year stretches that made moneyOut of every 3-year stretch on record	100%	100%
Ups and downsLast 3 years. Lower is steadier.	15.9%Steadier	18.0%

Risk level

A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap FundVery High
From the fund house, as of 30 Sept 2026
B: ITI Mid Cap FundSee the fund house's risk level

Smallest SIP

The basics
	A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund	B: ITI Mid Cap Fund
Risk level	Very HighFrom the fund house, as of 30 Sept 2026	See the fund house's risk level
Smallest SIP	₹100 a month	₹500 a month
Track recordYears of price history

Return in each calendar year.

Year by year
	A: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund	B: ITI Mid Cap Fund
2026 so far (total, not a yearly rate)	+5.0%Higher	−1.7%
2025	+5.2%Higher	+4.8%
2024	+33.4%Higher	+30.1%
2023	+41.5%Higher	+41.1%
2022	Not enough history	+1.7%
2021	Not enough history	Not enough history

Past performance may or may not be sustained in future and is not a guarantee of future returns.