Compare mutual funds | Krystal Capitals

How much it grew
	A: Sundaram Mid Cap Fund	B: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund	C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
3-year returnA year, on average	+15.1%	+17.4%	+18.1%Higher
1-year returnTotal over the last year	−0.7%	+0.3%	+5.8%Higher
5-year returnA year, on average	+13.6%	+14.2%Higher	Not enough history
Since launchA year, on average, with at least a year of history	+15.1%from Apr 2006	+17.9%from Nov 2016	+19.7%Higherfrom Sept 2022

How it held up in falls

Worst fall

Biggest drop from a high, and when

How it held up in falls
	A: Sundaram Mid Cap Fund	B: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund	C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
Worst fallBiggest drop from a high, and when	−68.7%Jan 2008 – Mar 2009	−41.1%Jan 2018 – Mar 2020	−19.7%Smaller fallDec 2024 – Apr 2025

3-year stretches that made money

Out of every 3-year stretch on record

How steady it was
Ups and downs
	A: Sundaram Mid Cap Fund	B: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund	C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
3-year stretches that made moneyOut of every 3-year stretch on record	92%	95%	100%Steadier

Risk level

A: Sundaram Mid Cap FundSee the fund house's risk level
B: Edelweiss Mid Cap FundSee the fund house's risk level
C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap FundVery High
From the fund house, as of 30 Sept 2026

Smallest SIP

The basics
	A: Sundaram Mid Cap Fund	B: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund	C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
Risk level	See the fund house's risk level	See the fund house's risk level	Very HighFrom the fund house, as of 30 Sept 2026
Smallest SIP	₹100 a month

Return in each calendar year.

Year by year
	A: Sundaram Mid Cap Fund	B: Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund	C: WhiteOak Capital Mid Cap Fund
2026 so far (total, not a yearly rate)	−2.3%	−1.4%	+5.0%Higher
2025	+4.1%	+3.8%	+5.2%Higher
2024	+32.0%	+38.9%Higher	+33.4%
2023	+40.4%	+38.4%	+41.5%Higher
2022	+4.8%Higher	+2.4%	Not enough history
2021	+37.5%	+50.3%Higher	Not enough history

Past performance may or may not be sustained in future and is not a guarantee of future returns.