Compare mutual funds | Krystal Capitals

How much it grew
	A: JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund	B: Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund	C: HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund	D: Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
3-year returnA year, on averageMiddle return of funds of this type we offer: +8.9% a year	+9.4%	+11.0%	+11.3%	+12.3%Higher
1-year returnTotal over the last year	−4.8%	+2.5%Higher	+0.6%	+1.6%
5-year returnA year, on average	+10.4%Higher	+9.6%	Not enough history	+8.8%
Since launchA year, on average, with at least a year of history	+8.9%from Apr 2006	+12.0%from Apr 2006	+12.2%Higherfrom Nov 2022	+10.8%from Jan 2017

How it held up in falls

Worst fall

Biggest drop from a high, and when

How it held up in falls
	A: JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund	B: Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund	C: HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund	D: Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
Worst fallBiggest drop from a high, and when	−64.9%Jan 2008 – Mar 2009	−55.6%Jan 2008 – Mar 2009

3-year stretches that made money

Out of every 3-year stretch on record

How steady it was
	A: JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund	B: Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund	C: HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund	D: Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
3-year stretches that made moneyOut of every 3-year stretch on record	85%	92%

Risk level

Often used for

What funds of this type are usually for

Smallest SIP

The basics
	A: JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund	B: Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund	C: HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund	D: Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
Risk level	See the fund house's risk level	See the fund house's risk level	See the fund house's risk level

Return in each calendar year.

Year by year
	A: JM Aggressive Hybrid Fund	B: Quant Aggressive Hybrid Fund	C: HSBC Aggressive Hybrid Fund	D: Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
2026 so far (total, not a yearly rate)	−2.3%	+2.4%	+2.8%Higher	+1.0%
2025	−3.1%	+9.3%Higher	+1.4%	+7.7%
2024	+27.0%Higher	+10.5%	+22.7%	+21.0%
2023	+33.8%Higher	+15.7%	+24.3%	+20.4%
2022	+8.1%	+13.3%Higher	Not enough history	−1.1%
2021	+22.9%	+44.5%Higher	Not enough history	+30.8%

Past performance may or may not be sustained in future and is not a guarantee of future returns.

Worst 3-year stretchA year, from the unluckiest start date	−11.3%Apr 2006 – Apr 2009	−5.7%Smaller fallMay 2006 – Apr 2009	Not enough history	−5.8%Mar 2017 – Apr 2020

Worst calendar yearThe year and its return	−56.8%in 2008	−47.8%in 2008	+1.4%Smaller fallin 2025	−3.8%in 2018

Ups and downsLast 3 years. Lower is steadier.	12.5%	13.0%	13.5%	11.9%Steadier

Typical 3-year returnThe middle of all 3-year stretches, a year	+10.5%	+11.7%	Not enough history	+13.9%Steadier

Often used forWhat funds of this type are usually for	Long-term goals, with some money in bonds.	Long-term goals, with some money in bonds.	Long-term goals, with some money in bonds.	Long-term goals, with some money in bonds.